Comments on: Towards Trans Sanity http://radicalbitch.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/towards-trans-sanity/ horizontal-eco feminist thoughts for a new feminist model Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:09:24 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: rbilleaud http://radicalbitch.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/towards-trans-sanity/#comment-8 rbilleaud Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:05:38 +0000 http://radicalbitch.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/towards-trans-sanity/#comment-8 Interesting that in the first paragraph you speak of a gender continuum, but only in regard to transgenderism. It has long been my arguement, although not supported by any scientific analysis, that a gender continuum DOES exist, but it exists across the board, encompassing heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals as well as transgenders. In other words, there are those people, pehaps even the majority of the population, who do not fit neatly into one of those categories. What about the man who is outwardly very heterosexual, but harbors fantasies of being with another man, or an individual who cross-dresses, and when they are dressed psychologically "becomes" a member or the opposite sex, college girls who "experiment" with other girls. The list in almost endless, hence my conclusion. Just curious about your thoughts on the matter. Interesting that in the first paragraph you speak of a gender continuum, but only in regard to transgenderism. It has long been my arguement, although not supported by any scientific analysis, that a gender continuum DOES exist, but it exists across the board, encompassing heterosexuals, homosexuals and bisexuals as well as transgenders. In other words, there are those people, pehaps even the majority of the population, who do not fit neatly into one of those categories. What about the man who is outwardly very heterosexual, but harbors fantasies of being with another man, or an individual who cross-dresses, and when they are dressed psychologically “becomes” a member or the opposite sex, college girls who “experiment” with other girls. The list in almost endless, hence my conclusion. Just curious about your thoughts on the matter.

]]>