This is actually a heart breaker for me because this was something I worked passionately for, but I no longer can support a trans inclusive ENDA without limitations placed on it. You see there really is an apparent “transgender” agenda, it aims at nothing less than the invasion of every single woman’s space out there including the most intimate ones where there is female nudity. A penetration of these spaces by people with the very badge of the patriarchy, phallus’s, wielded by those who like having them and plan on keeping them. This I can never agree to, this I cannot support in any fashion at all. No reasonable person could in my opinion. And therein lies the crux of the matter, those heading up the current trans civil rights movement are not reasonable people, they are completely self-centred, bristling with male entitlement and literally cannot see why anyone would think someone with a penis in the most intimate of women’s space would be seen as a problem for anyone who isn’t a gender bigot.

Yes, unbelievably, they actually think this. They have invented a couple of new terms that they toss around expecting everyone to understand, “cisgendered” and “cissexual” apparently these terms refer to those who have a consistent gender identity and body image. The usage indicates that those fitting these terms are some sort of bigot who must be re-educated. Mind you, that would include 99.9% of the people on the planet, but they know best, they are right, everyone else must conform to their wishes. One of these people even insists that crossdressing men are actually dying for lack of using the ladies room! Ok, please show me the bodies, hell, show me a single body of a crossdresser this is true for. Naturally there aren’t any……this is beyond ridiculous but this same person insists that women are natural aggressors who sexually harass and rape which begs the question why he wants access to women’s restrooms then. Others ask how anyone could possibly have a problem with someone in an intimate women’s space with a full set of functioning wedding tackle but claims to “feel like a woman”. A sincere inability to see how any reasonable person could object to this! And this is the tip of the gender deconstructionist iceberg, not an couple isolated nutcases.

I used to be a “trans-activist” myself and when Congressman Barney Frank objected to trans inclusion in ENDA on the basis of a hidden agenda of men in women’s shower rooms I used to sincerely believe this was a red herring along with the idea that there would be those who then insisted on going to work as women when they felt like it based on having a “girl day” and then using the women’s washrooms on those days. I was wrong, he was right. These people have crawled out of the woodwork on several LGBT blogs insisting on the right to do just this! They will do it and if a trans inclusive ENDA is passed, they will cause incidents and there will be an eventual backlash that will result in loss of all recognition of civil rights of those who suffered from a birth condition, corrected it and got on with their lives, (men and women of transsexual history) and this backlash will most likely also go against gay men and lesbian women and their hard won civil rights as well since the transgender movement has successfully linked themselves to gay and lesbian rights.

I used to believe this was not true based on the experiences of hundreds and hundreds of women of transsexual history I know personally, none of us would have dreamed of using a women’s communal shower before surgical correction, it was an unthinkable violation of the rights of other women and we waited until after our bodies were fully female before we did this. I used to believe that someone claiming the right to go to work female one day, male the next and female the next was so absurd no one could possibly consider it any more than someone deciding they were having a rabbit day would think it appropriate to dress for work that day as Harvey the Rabbit as their basic civil right. I was wrong, these people actually think this is their basic civil right to do so. Having spent the last ten years ruthlessly expelling anyone classic transsexual from their ranks and erasing the term “transsexual” itself from having any meaning by claiming everyone transsexual is lumped with those who crossdress for sexual thrills or whatever reason, they are planning this invasion of the cisgendered complete with re-education. They view any suggestion that they might be wrong as hate speech, they will consider no compromise.

The real victims in all this are the people of transsexual history who simply want to be able to live their lives in peace with those around them. They are the butch lesbians who would have been covered under gender expression, the effeminate men, the intersexed. Their civil rights are being held hostage to these radical gender deconstructionists who feel they have the absolute right to force their vision on the rest of the world even though they aren’t even a single percent of the world themselves. The unfortunate solution is to hope those non-gender conforming gays and lesbians will have enough coverage under the orientation part of ENDA and restrict gender coverage to those who are undergoing actual medical model treatment for transsexuality and recognition of the sex of those who have already undergone this treatment and living their lives in their corrected sex. Instantly the penises in the women’s showers, the crossdressing teachers, the men in the ladies room issues are dealt with. We have to jettison the transgenders, they left us no choice in the matter, they have told you straight out they plan to do exactly those things that their “opposition” fears and it can no longer be denied but must be addressed now.