It’s just up on Bilerico Cook Riley , founder of IFGE and Transvestite Travesty magazine confesses to a sympathic transvestite apologist Jillian Wiess how “she” and perpetual transvestites Philiss Frye and transsexual hating Charley Prince aka Arnold Lowman conspired to erase women of history because they were pissed most went stealth within six months of corrective surgery. Make no mistake, it was transvestites that made up and pushed “transgender” to escape the fetishistic nature of their makeup. One of them was literally the most transsexual phobic asshole who ever walked the face of the earth, Prince. Riley’s IFGE named the highest honour in transvestitism after this transsexual hating jerk… the Virginia Prince Lifetime Achievement Award (for hating women born transsexed)
You know what is left out of the story? That at the time they did this there was widespread public acceptance of transsexuality due to about eight years of talk shows on the subject making it so normal it no longer worked for sweeps week. That a quickly buried set of polls done by HRC around this time showed that even in the south there was a 70% acceptance rate of transssexuality and full civil rights for those post corrected while on the same polls acceptance of gays and lesbians never rose above 30% This is the real reason HRC bought off all the trans civil rights leaders of that time, This is why HRC pre-lobbied against and with our bought leaders each and every lobbying effort for trans civil rights (most of the trans activists then were transsexed people) This is why they continue to this day to promote transgender and erase transsexual from public view. They knew the best way to combat public acceptance of women born transsexed was to replace them with the image of men in dresses, chicks with dicks and drag queens all using and demanding female pronouns like the most outrageous nelly queens of the past.
You know what other word was absent from Riley’s interview? Woman. No surprise there is there? CookRiley is all about the fetish and transgender. You know why post corrected women are so careful about the terminology? Because we are women, period. We fix our bodies to female norm and go on to the lives of women in all it’s glorious, non transbullshit glory. Listen to Riley proclaim we never get to escape the clutches of fetishistic masturbators, yes that is actually said. The AMA says transsexuality can be cured, the APA is also about to make that official. Cured, as in women post corrected, as in not trans anything anymore. But the transvestites?, hell no. It is they that taught the religious right to deny our womanhood, not the other way around. It is they who almost singlehandedly revived an almost dead radical lesbian separatist movement with a primary goal of anti-trans.
I transitioned around the time this erasure took place. I began my own advocacy work at that time and never understood the total refusal to use transgender and transsexual at that time. I witnessed first hand the change in the public perceptions when they learned of my history from an automatic assumption I was post operative or soon would be to “chick with a dick”. They did this in conspiracy with Gay Inc. What I always suspected is now confirmed, that the erasure was deliberate and conspired. Today, as some of us have been speaking out and reclaiming just the concept of transsexual in it’s original medical meaning we are faced with penis packing perpetual transvestites like Autumn-I’m too insane to remember to dilate besides I like my low maintenance dick- Sandeen, Monica-your neo vagina is fake- Helms, Monica-check out my 7″ neo-clit- Roberts and self confessed sociopath Toni -Fear me and my totally made up credentials-D’orsay claiming they are transsexuals. The good news is their antics have completely alienated most mainstream gay men and moderate lesbian women to the point even Gay Inc. will have trouble claiming the “t” in the future. And in a year or less the DSM revision will be out which recognizes them as the mentally ill people so many of them already brag about being. I feel for those who will suffer because of this but they failed to call out the bigotry and will be reaping what the outspoken lunatics sowed in their names.
PS. Weiss is all about the transvestites and nothing about the rights of women. The time has come to pick a side because today’s transvestite rights movement is as anti woman as it gets and wastes no opportunity to demonstrate it. Weiss picked her side, fetishists against women.
August 16, 2011 at 4:03 pm
Thanks. I would call this a Paul Harvey moment …. “and now for the rest of the story”.
August 16, 2011 at 4:10 pm
My jaw literally dropped when I listened to the interview. I knew this was true but could never get actual proof. Weiss must have been out of her mind to put this interview up, she had to know what the reaction outside the echo chamber of Bilerico this would draw. I had planned to never again write on these issues but now I feel I will have to follow up with a detailed account of HRCs crimes back then. This story needs told.
August 16, 2011 at 8:24 pm
Thanks for writing this. I finally got to listen to the audio and wow. I think we should be thanking them for publishing that. I am gong to soak it in a bit.
August 16, 2011 at 11:15 pm
I feel vindicated. I’ve been saying this is how things went down for some 15 years.
The funny thing is that they screwed over the actual 24/7/365 transgender/queens that folks like Carol Katz and Jude Patton used the term for in the 1970s.
Which makes the whole erasing the queens who were actually a part of the gay community even nastier.
August 17, 2011 at 8:34 am
Thanks for this essential piece of history. I’m FAB (an xx-chrom being) and trying to get a picture of how all this developed.
August 17, 2011 at 10:26 am
Google search for +”yvonne cook-riley” +”women’s rights”
4 results.
What a shocker, huh.
And
http://www.archive.org/details/gt372
yvonne cook-riley – I was a fetishistic cross-dresser.
As I have been saying more and more lately. The Transgender fight is more for men’s rights than for women’s rights.
August 18, 2011 at 12:09 am
Well it was an amazing interview as Cook admitted that fetish types aren’t seen in general society in a positive light, so they make up some meaningless word, transgender, and confuse the public by making it seem like these individuals are somehow associated with those having a treatable transsexual medical condition. I mean like after all an orange is nearly an apple isn’t it? They’re both round, and the orange is nearly red, isn’t it? Well, I don’t know how to break this news to people, but an orange isn’t an apple, any more than a drag queen is a cross dresser, or a cross dresser is a transsexual. These are not linearly related states, but completely separate situations with different causes, motivations, interests, and needs. Transsexualism should be treated as the separate medical condition it is. Those who call themselves transgender shouldn’t be condemned for being cross dressers, drag queens, etc., but it should be made clear that such situations have nothing to do with being transsexual, which is a treatable medical condition.
September 10, 2011 at 1:45 pm
Hi
This is terrifying and i totally understand your point, C. I’ve generally been a supporter of the alliance in the past but both personal experiences and hearing horror stories like this increasingly make me realise i have nothing in common with the TG-propaganda crowd.
And yes (referring to your comment) – the story needs to be told, and i would implore you to follow up with the story about HRC’s crimes – that proof of the buried poll would radically change my worldview – and probably that of more women of history still undecided on the issue than you could imagine.
much love and thanks for what you are doing
xxxx
T0t3ntanz